ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2026
In vitro Host-Parasite Models Combined With Proteomics Reveal Cell Type-Specific Responses of Early Migrating Fasciola hepatica Juveniles.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The trematode Fasciola hepatica has a complex life cycle involving two hosts. Infection of the definitive host, mainly livestock and humans, occurs through ingestion of the infective stage, the metacercariae, which excyst in the duodenum and release newly excysted juveniles (FhNEJ). These FhNEJ first interact with small intestinal epithelial cells (SIECs), penetrate across the intestinal wall, through the peritoneum, migrating over mesothelial cells (MCs) toward the liver and the biliary tree, where they develop into adult worms and establish chronically. We recently described the in vitro interactions of FhNEJ with SIEC at the proteomic level. Here, we extend this analysis to FhNEJ interactions with MC and hepatic stellate cells using a single cell type in vitro model combined with SWATH-MS-based proteomics. However, a weak proteomic response was observed in both the parasite and MCs or hepatic stellate cells upon direct coincubation, with no clear signatures of targeted immune or structural activation. Based on these findings, we developed a sequential cell type in vitro model in which FhNEJ were first incubated with SIECs and then with MCs, to assess whether a specific sequence of host cell contacts is required to elicit detectable proteomic responses. This approach revealed a higher number of differentially expressed proteins upon interaction than in the single cell type in vitro model, particularly in the parasite, reflecting increased activity during cell-to-cell transitions, including processes such as proteolysis, which likely support tissue migration and host interaction. The results indicate that FhNEJ exhibit a dynamic response to host cell-specific interactions, with early activation following SIEC interaction and subsequent attenuation after contact with MCs, notably affecting focal adhesion pathways in the latter cell type. These findings support the idea that sequential host cell encounters are necessary for effective recognition and interaction by the FhNEJ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.