Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41763592›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of ophthalmology2026

Adaptive Temporal Mixture of Experts for Predicting Stiffness Metrics From the Ocular Response Analyzer and Identifying Keratoconus.

Yue Zhang, Swati Padhee, Phillip T Yuhas, Cynthia J Roberts, Srinivasan Parthasarathy

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yue ZhangFrom the Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Y.Z., Sw.P., Sr.P.), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Swati PadheeFrom the Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Y.Z., Sw.P., Sr.P.), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Phillip T YuhasCollege of Optometry (P.T.Y.), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Cynthia J RobertsDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (C.J.R.), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (C.J.R.), College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: roberts.8@osu.edu.
Srinivasan ParthasarathyFrom the Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Y.Z., Sw.P., Sr.P.), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: srini@cse.ohio-state.edu.

Funding

Corneal Biomechanics in Ocular DiseaseR01EY027399 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CYNTHIA J ROBERTS · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
The Ohio State University Vision Sciences Research Core Program (OSU-VSRCP)P30EY032857 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Sayoko E Moroi · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY032857NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a machine learning-based modeling approach for extracting elastic stiffness estimates from Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) waveforms.

designProspective observational cohort study with model training and testing using a development dataset and validation with an independent validation dataset.

methodsParticipants were prospectively enrolled into 6 cohorts for the development dataset, including control subjects, individuals diagnosed with keratoconus, diabetes mellitus with retinopathy and without retinopathy, primary open-angle glaucoma, and ocular hypertension. An independent validation dataset comprised data for two cohorts, including healthy participants and individuals diagnosed with keratoconus. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical data were collected using the ORA and Corvis ST devices for the development dataset. An Adaptive Temporal Mixture of Experts (AT-MoE) model, incorporating long short-term memory (LSTM) networks with dynamic expert selection, was trained using ORA waveform parameters and raw signals to predict stiffness parameters (SP) from Corvis ST, including SP-A1 representing corneal stiffness, SP-HC representing scleral stiffness, and SSI representing deformation stiffness. Predicted ORA stiffness estimates were independently validated with a separate dataset of keratoconus and healthy eyes. The ORA waveform parameters, as well as applanation and pressure signals, were used as input to the machine learning models to classify eyes with keratoconus versus healthy eyes, which was evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. The primary outcome measures were the predicted ORA stiffness estimates, including corneal stiffness estimate, scleral stiffness estimate, and deformation stiffness estimate.

resultsThe AT-MoE model significantly outperformed the baseline LSTM in predicting ocular stiffness estimates using ORA input data with reduction of prediction error. The AT-MoE model also resulted in improvement of keratoconus detection performance in the independent validation dataset with AUROC=0.9512, which is similar to performance of tomographic detection approaches.

conclusionsThe AT-MoE model provides a novel and accurate framework for deriving elastic stiffness estimates from ORA waveforms, and offers improved diagnostic capability for keratoconus compared to traditional machine learning models. This method has the potential to expand the utility of the ORA device for biomechanical assessment in clinical settings.

Indexed as

CorneaElasticityIntraocular PressureKeratoconusMachine LearningAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansLong Short Term MemoryMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsProspective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID41763592
PMCPMC13183170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.