ArticleProgress in neurobiology2026
Multiplexed changes in synaptic transmission underlie stress-induced reduction of persistent firing in the parietal cortex.
Article in Progress in neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repeated exposure to stress disrupts cognitive processes, including attention and working memory. A key mechanism supporting these functions is the ability of neurons to sustain action potential firing, even after a stimulus is no longer present. How stress impacts this persistent neuronal activity is currently unknown. We found that repeated exposure to multiple concurrent stressors during adolescence (aRMS) impedes the ability of layer 5 pyramidal neurons (L5 PNs) in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) to produce persistent firing. To determine the mechanisms underlying this effect, we complemented computational modelling with whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology in acute brain slices from male mice. Our model predicted that altered intrinsic excitability, reduced local connectivity, diminished glutamatergic transmission, or enhanced inhibition could explain diminished persistent activity. In ex vivo experiments, we found minimal effect of aRMS on excitability and recurrent connectivity. However, stress exposure altered the properties of excitatory connections between L5 PNs, specifically affecting decay kinetics and short-term synaptic dynamics. In addition, aRMS increased inhibitory tone in the PPC, altering both GABAa and GABAb receptor-mediated responses. Incorporating the observed physiological changes into our network model, we found that no single parameter was sufficient alone to reproduce the stress-induced reduction in persistent firing. Rather, a combination of altered excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission was necessary to impact sustained activity. These data suggest that a multitude of converging changes in neural and circuit function underpin the effects of stress on cognitive processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.