ReviewActa biomaterialia2026
Potential of intranasal delivery of human mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular vesicles for stroke therapy.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-based therapies for autism spectrum disorder: emerging evidence and clinical prospects.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Neurovascular unit remodeling: focusing on glial cells in stroke injury and recovery.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral ischemic stroke, caused by interrupted cerebral blood flow, remains a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. Current FDA-approved therapies-intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) and mechanical thrombectomy-are constrained by narrow time windows (4.5-24 h) and limited accessibility. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as promising candidates for neurorestoration, yet their therapeutic efficacy is hindered by poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration and systemic entrapment. Increasing evidence indicates that MSCs exert their therapeutic effects primarily through paracrine mechanisms mediated by extracellular vesicles (EVs), which regulate inflammation, apoptosis, neurogenesis, and angiogenesis. However, translation of EV-based therapies from bench to bedside remains limited, largely due to inefficient delivery and the invasiveness of existing routes. Intranasal (IN) administration offers a minimally invasive approach to bypass the BBB and achieve direct, repeated delivery to the brain. This review synthesizes the mechanistic foundations, preclinical progress, and translational potential of intranasal delivery of MSCs and their EVs for ischemic stroke therapy. We highlight comparative analyses of biodistribution, cellular targets, and functional outcomes across administration routes, emphasizing how route optimization governs therapeutic efficacy. Collectively, these insights establish intranasal delivery as a practical platform for next-generation, cell-free regenerative therapies targeting ischemic brain injury. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Despite extensive investigation of stem-cell-based interventions for ischemic stroke, the influence of administration route on therapeutic outcomes remains poorly defined. This review integrates preclinical and early-phase clinical findings to delineate how delivery pathways shape biodistribution, mechanistic engagement, and neurorepair efficacy of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and their derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). By contrasting conventional intravenous and intra-arterial approaches with the emerging intranasal route, this article emphasizes a non-invasive strategy capable of bypassing the blood-brain barrier, supporting multidose regimens, and sustaining localized repair. Beyond summarizing outcomes, this work clarifies mechanistic drivers-angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and immunomodulation-that can be fine-tuned through delivery design. The synthesis provides a framework for rationally optimizing cell-free hMSC-EV therapeutics and underscores the translational promise of intranasal delivery for clinical stroke management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.