ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2026
Central autonomic network-heart interplay in anorexia nervosa. A cross-spectral dynamic causal modeling study.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Central Autonomic Network (CAN) crucially maintains the homeostatic integrity of brain-heart communication, yet its directed interactions with cardiac control in anorexia nervosa (AN) remain poorly understood. To this end, we investigate the causal connectivity characterizing the CAN in 26 AN patients and 40 healthy controls, using a cross-spectral Dynamic Causal Modeling applied to resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). A Parametric Empirical Bayes framework was leveraged to estimate CAN connectivity group level differences and their linear association with group diagnosis and heart rate (HR). In patients, group connectivity differences revealed stronger top-down causal signaling from frontal/insular nodes to hypothalamus, alongside weaker connectivity from the anterior cingulate and insula to the hypothalamus and brainstem, respectively. These alterations may reflect bodily and emotional signals maladaptive processing at rest. In controls, HR was positively associated with most of the CAN connectivity, including with amygdala to prefrontal area causal influence: this might reflect a bottom-up role of amygdala in interoceptive signals processing, in absence of emotionally salient demands. In AN group, HR was negatively associated with most of the CAN connectivity, except for the connection from prefrontal to amygdala: in AN, a greater prefrontal control may emerge as a form of top-down compensatory regulation of limbic activity, at rest. Nevertheless, between-group CAN-HR differences were not found in the prefrontal-amygdala circuit. Instead, in patients, stronger top-down modulations encompassing frontal-insular and brainstem circuits resulted in driving maladaptive CAN-heart dynamics, compared to controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.