ReviewEcotoxicology and environmental safety2026
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: A novel risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
Review in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Size-Resolved PMToxics · 2026Article
- Imaging and Molecular Biomarkers of PFAS-Related Vascular Aging: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Exposure and Ischemic Heart Disease: Emerging Evidence from the Literature.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Resmetirom attenuates atherosclerosis-associated dyslipidemia and vascular inflammation in high-fat diet-fed ApoE-/- mice.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the major contributor to global mortality. Exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), synthetic chemicals that are persistent in the environment and the human body, has emerged as a novel risk factor for CVDs. In this review, we conducted a structured literature search in PubMed and Web of Science to identify original research articles published up to February 14, 2025. We summarized the epidemiological findings for the impact of PFAS exposure on CVDs and the pathologic precursors of CVDs including hypertension, atherosclerosis, and arterial stiffness. Although inconclusive, current evidence suggests a potential association between PFAS exposure, primarily legacy congeners such as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), with increased incidence, prevalence, and mortality of various CVDs, including ischemic heart disease and stroke, as well as elevated blood pressure, aggravated atherosclerosis, and arterial stiffening. Sex, age, socioeconomic status, and underlying health conditions may influence susceptibility to the cardiovascular effects of PFAS exposure; however, current evidence remains inconclusive. Future work is needed to assess the safety of a broader range of PFAS compounds, particularly the emerging ones. The majority of the existing studies evaluating the association between PFAS exposure and CVDs are cross-sectional. Experimental and longitudinal studies are warranted to establish the causal relationship between PFAS exposure and CVDs, as well as to elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.