ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2026
A shared predictive architecture in the sensory cortex for statistical and reward-based learning.
Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sensory cortex is widely considered a feed-forward feature extractor whose stimulus-driven responses can be modified by context or experience. Recent work, however, suggests a richer role. In implicit, statistical learning, mismatch responses in primary auditory and visual areas point to a computation of sensory prediction errors. In explicit, reward-based learning, converging evidence shows that populations in the sensory cortex rapidly develop reward prediction activity, firing when an expected outcome would follow the stimulus. These results demonstrate that, alongside feature representation, the sensory cortex has another core function: prediction. This predictive role could, in principle, be implemented by one circuit motif: feed-forward drive to basal dendrites, distal input to apical tufts, and local disinhibition. When the distal input carries a sensory prediction, the sensory cortex computes prediction errors by directly comparing predicted (distal) with actual, feedforward drive. When it carries outcome information, the sensory cortex computes a prediction, without computing errors. We assemble the empirical foundation for this possibility drawn primarily from the auditory cortex, complemented by convergent results from other sensory cortices and then provide a roadmap to test this principle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.