ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Caries in primary teeth and caries in permanent teeth: association and effect modifiers.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the relationship between caries in primary teeth and caries in permanent teeth among primary school students, and to identify potential effect modifiers of this relationship.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized real-world caries examination data from the School Dental Care Service (SDCS) provided by the Hong Kong SAR government. Primary school students in grades 3 (P3) or 4 (P4) who participated in the SDCS were recruited from school dental clinics. The exposure was defined as any caries experience in primary teeth in Grade 1. To account for potential confounding factors, the marginal structural model with overlap weight was applied to estimate the average treatment effect for the overlap population.
resultsAmong 825 children (mean [SD] age in P1: 6.2 [0.3]; boys 54.7%) without caries in permanent teeth (DMFT = 0) in P1, the incidence of caries experience in permanent teeth (DMFT > 0) increased to 5.7% and 10.5% in P2 and P3, respectively. Among those with caries experience in primary teeth (dmft > 0, n = 443), 15.4% had caries experience in permanent teeth in P3 compared to only 4.9% among those without (n = 382; adjusted risk ratio 2.8 [95% CI: 1.7-4.8; P < .001]; adjusted risk difference 9.6% [95% CI: 5.4-13.8; P < .001]). Sex and only-child status significantly modified this relationship, with stronger associations observed in boys and non-only children.
conclusionsCaries in primary teeth increased the risk of developing caries in permanent teeth. This association was modified by sex and only-child status. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Controlling caries in primary teeth is essential for preventing caries in permanent teeth. Risk-stratified interventions targeting boys and non-only children may optimize preventive outcomes and resource allocation in oral health promotion programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.