Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41762411›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2026

Ensuring enantiomeric consistency in FAPI radiopharmaceuticals: comparative analysis of (S)- and (S/R)-FAPI-46/-74 confirms pharmacological equivalence.

Magdalena Staniszewska, Ralph Hübner, Camilla Locatelli, Douglas Howard, Matilde Forni, Francis Man, Bent Wilhelm Schoultz, Syed Nuruddin, Ingrid Sofie Norberg-Schulz Hagen, Sherly Mosessian and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Magdalena Staniszewska *Preclinical Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen and DKTK-Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45131, Germany.
Ralph Hübner *Preclinical Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen and DKTK-Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45131, Germany. Ralph.Huebner@ext.uk-essen.de.
Camilla LocatelliPreclinical Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen and DKTK-Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45131, Germany.
Douglas HowardPreclinical Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen and DKTK-Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45131, Germany.
Matilde ForniGE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway.
Francis ManGE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, UK.
Bent Wilhelm SchoultzOslo Imaging and Therapy Laboratory - Norsk Medisinsk Syklotronsenter AS, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Syed NuruddinOslo Imaging and Therapy Laboratory - Norsk Medisinsk Syklotronsenter AS, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Sofie Norberg-Schulz HagenOslo Imaging and Therapy Laboratory - Norsk Medisinsk Syklotronsenter AS, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sherly MosessianSofie Biosciences Inc, Dulles, VA, USA.
Ken HerrmannPreclinical Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen and DKTK-Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45131, Germany.
Valeska von KiedrowskiPreclinical Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen and DKTK-Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45131, Germany.
Katharina LückerathPreclinical Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen and DKTK-Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen, 45131, Germany. katharina.lueckerath@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-2066

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnantiomeric composition may impact binding and potentially performance of a drug product but is not routinely tested and minimum acceptance criteria are not always established. Some batches of the precursors FAPI-46 and FAPI-74 used clinically contain a mixture of (S)- and (R)-enantiomers. This study investigates the in vitro pharmacodynamic characteristics of different enantiomeric compositions of FAP-targeting radioligands FAPI-46 and FAPI-74 and in vivo pharmacokinetics of FAPI-46 in naïve mice.

results(S)-, (R)-, and (S/R)-enantiomers of radiolabeled FAPI-46 and FAPI-74 were evaluated for stability in human serum, binding affinity, internalization, retention, and selectivity using HT1080-hFAP cells and HEK293-hCD26 cells. All enantiomeric compositions showed high stability in human serum with minimal serum protein adhesion. (S)- and (S/R)-enantiomers exhibited comparable binding, internalization, and retention characteristics. High selectivity for FAP over CD26/DPP4 was maintained. (R)-enantiomers showed no specific binding to FAP. Additionally, the same enantiomers of

conclusionThese findings provide important validation that current clinical (S/R)-mixtures of FAPI-46/-74 exhibit pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior comparable to pure (S)-enantiomers, supporting regulatory confidence and cross-trial reproducibility in the global FAPI-46/-74 imaging landscape.

Indexed as

EnantiomersFAPI-46FAPI-74PharmacodynamicsPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID41762411
PMCPMC13057127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.