ArticleJournal of community genetics2026
The disclosure of a diagnosis of neuromuscular disease in adulthood: a qualitative study of patients' memories.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a scarcity of studies on the disclosure of diagnosis in adult patients with neuromuscular diseases. The act of disclosing a diagnosis is a pivotal event, particularly when it pertains to genetic, rare, chronic, and progressive illnesses. The objective of this study is to explore the memories and perceptions associated with receiving a diagnosis of a neuromuscular disease in a retrospective study. We conducted semi-structured interviews with n = 30 patients who had received a neuromuscular disease diagnosis at least 1 year and up to 37 years prior to participation in the study. Audio recordings of these interviews were made and transcribed. We carried out a textual analysis with IRaMuTeQ software to identify the main themes of the corpus. Four classes were identified: (1) the confirmation of the diagnostic results, (2) diagnostic delay, (3) psychological representations of neuromuscular disease and their disclosure, and finally (4) the genetic dimension, which also appears as a key theme. The results of this exploration of memories related to the disclosure of a neuromuscular disease diagnosis could help improve the conditions under which such diagnoses are communicated. The method used could also be adapted for the disclosure of other chronic, progressive diseases with a genetic component.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.