ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026
Age of Acquisition Effect in Second Language Emotion Word Recognition: A Cross-Task Validation.
Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the effect of the age of acquisition (AoA) has been comprehensively investigated in a multitude of research undertakings, the way emotion word processing in the second language (L2) is regulated by AoA, in combination with other affective components like valence and arousal, remains relatively underexplored. Thus, in this study, the influences of objective AoA, valence, and arousal on English emotion word recognition among Chinese-English bilinguals were probed through two experiments. In Experiment 1, the valence judgment task was adopted to explore the roles and interaction of objective valence and AoA in emotion word recognition. In Experiment 2, the lexical decision task was utilized to scrutinize the effects of objective AoA and arousal, along with their interaction. The objective AoA effect was affirmed across the two experiments, indicating that early-acquired words were processed more rapidly than later-acquired words. The facilitating effect of arousal and positivity was also substantiated. The results offered conclusive evidence of the independent impacts of AoA, valence, and arousal on L2 emotion word recognition and further buttressed the disembodied account and semantic hypothesis for L2 AoA effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41762346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.