Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41762346›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026

Age of Acquisition Effect in Second Language Emotion Word Recognition: A Cross-Task Validation.

Tianai Li, Chenggang Wu, Juan Zhang, Jue Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianai LiKey Laboratory of Multilingual Education with AI, School of Education, Shanghai International Studies University, Room 1306, 1550 Wenxiang Road, Songjiang, Shanghai, China.
Chenggang WuKey Laboratory of Multilingual Education with AI, School of Education, Shanghai International Studies University, Room 1306, 1550 Wenxiang Road, Songjiang, Shanghai, China. chenggangwu@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3837-3841
Juan ZhangFaculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Jue WangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, China.

Funding

Shanghai International Studies University NAShanghai Office of Philosophy and Social Science 2020EYY004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the effect of the age of acquisition (AoA) has been comprehensively investigated in a multitude of research undertakings, the way emotion word processing in the second language (L2) is regulated by AoA, in combination with other affective components like valence and arousal, remains relatively underexplored. Thus, in this study, the influences of objective AoA, valence, and arousal on English emotion word recognition among Chinese-English bilinguals were probed through two experiments. In Experiment 1, the valence judgment task was adopted to explore the roles and interaction of objective valence and AoA in emotion word recognition. In Experiment 2, the lexical decision task was utilized to scrutinize the effects of objective AoA and arousal, along with their interaction. The objective AoA effect was affirmed across the two experiments, indicating that early-acquired words were processed more rapidly than later-acquired words. The facilitating effect of arousal and positivity was also substantiated. The results offered conclusive evidence of the independent impacts of AoA, valence, and arousal on L2 emotion word recognition and further buttressed the disembodied account and semantic hypothesis for L2 AoA effect.

Indexed as

EmotionsMultilingualismPsycholinguisticsRecognition, PsychologyAdultAge FactorsArousalFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAge of acquisitionArousalEmotion wordSecond languageValence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.