ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026
Sex differences in obstructive sleep apnea: a population-based study from northeastern Germany.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep-related breathing disorder that is diagnosed more frequently in men. The aim of this population-based cross-sectional study was to describe sex-specific differences in sleep stage distribution and subjective daytime sleepiness in individuals with OSA. Special attention was given to the distribution of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM sleep.
methodsThis study analyzed data from the SHIP-TREND-0 cohort, a population-based study from northeastern Germany. Standardized polysomnography identified 604 participants with an AHI ≥ 5 (395 men, 209 women) who were included in this study. In addition, daytime sleepiness was recorded using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Sex differences were analyzed descriptively and evaluated according to effect sizes.
resultsCompared to males, females were on average older and had higher BMI values. Women showed descriptively higher AHI values in REM sleep than in non-REM sleep, whereas men exhibited a more balanced distribution of AHI across sleep stages. Women had a longer REM sleep latency (d = 0.36).
conclusionsOur results indicate sex-specific differences in the distribution of obstructive events across sleep stages. The AHI during REM sleep should receive greater consideration in the diagnosis and assessment of severity, particularly in women. Further population-based studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate their clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.