Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41762328›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2026

Evaluation of a commercial multispecies rapid test for anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in unconventional animal species.

Sergio Villanueva-Saz, Ana González, María D Pérez, Delia Lacasta, Antonio Fernández, Pablo Quilez, Aurora Ortín, David Guallar, Álex Gómez, Diana Marteles-Aragüés

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sergio Villanueva-SazDepartment of Animal Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain. svs@unizar.es.
Ana GonzálezDepartment of Animal Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
María D PérezInstituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2 (Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA), Zaragoza, 50013, Spain.
Delia LacastaDepartment of Animal Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Antonio FernándezDepartment of Animal Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Pablo QuilezDepartment of Animal Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Aurora OrtínDepartment of Animal Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
David GuallarDepartment of Animal Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Álex GómezDepartment of Animal Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, 177 Miguel Servet Street, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain.
Diana Marteles-AragüésClinical Immunology Laboratory, Veterinary Faculty, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50013, Spain. dmartelesaragues@unizar.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leishmania infantum is a vector-borne protozoan causing zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in the Mediterranean basin, where dogs are the primary reservoir. However, infection in various domestic and wild mammals raises questions about their epidemiological roles. Reliable diagnosis in non-canine species remains challenging, as most serological assays are developed for dogs and cats. This study evaluated a commercially available multispecies rapid immunochromatographic test (Uranotest® Leishmania feline) for detecting anti-Leishmania antibodies in a diverse panel of domestic and non-domestic animals. A total of 186 serum samples from different species were analyzed, previously classified as seropositive (n = 65) or seronegative (n = 121) using an in-house ELISA as reference. Immunochromatographic rapid test performance was compared to ELISA results using Cohen’s kappa to assess agreement. Overall agreement reached 82.3% (κ = 0.56), indicating moderate concordance. This immunochromatographic test correctly identified all positive and negative canine and feline samples and showed perfect agreement in other carnivores such as mink and wolves. In contrast, all herbivorous species, including alpaca, horses, goats, llama, sheep, bison, and dromedaries, produced negative results by the rapid test despite ELISA seropositivity, suggesting limited affinity of the conjugate for herbivore immunoglobulins. These findings indicate that, while the assayed rapid test is suitable for detecting anti-Leishmania antibodies in non-herbivorous species, it is unreliable for herbivores. The study highlights the importance of species-specific validation of serological assays and suggests that rapid tests using protein A conjugates may have restricted cross-species utility, reinforcing the need for adapted diagnostic tools in multispecies and wildlife contexts.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ProtozoanChromatography, AffinityLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasis, VisceralAnimalsCatsDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayRapid Diagnostic TestsSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ProtozoanAnimalsELISAImmunochromatographic testLeishmania infantumPoint-of-care testSerology

Identifiers

PMID41762328
PMCPMC12950076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.