ArticleActa neurochirurgica2026
Anatomical insights into the peri-trigeminal zone via transorbital, transclival, and retrosigmoid routes: a comparative cadaveric study with surgical implications.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical access to brainstem (BS) lesions requires small neurotomies in between a dense and complex neural fiber network. Access is gained on the BS surface closest to the lesion to minimize the intraparenchymal trajectory and reduce the risk of neurological injury. The concept of safe-entry zones guides the selection of the most favorable entry point to reduce these risks. Several endoscopic approaches have been validated as safe and effective for accessing the peritrigeminal zone (PTZ); however, each one is limited by anatomical constraints due to adjacent osteo-vascular structures, which restrict the surgical corridor. To evaluate the anatomical advantages and limitations of accessing the PTZ via the endonasal transclival approach (ETTA), retrosigmoid approach (RS), and endoscopic transorbital approach (ETOA).
methodsThe ETTA, RS, and ETOA approaches were performed on five human cadaveric specimens (25 approaches). Before dissection, all specimens underwent high-field magnetic resonance imaging, including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences for tractography reconstruction. An anatomical assessment was then conducted to verify accessibility to the PTZ. The potential surgical trajectory, approach length, and surgical view's angle were measured and compared across the three approaches.
resultsAll approaches allowed access to the PTZ; however, each one exhibited structural limitations affecting surgical maneuverability. Comparative anatomical and radiological analysis highlighted procedural insights to guide the selection of the most appropriate surgical corridor based on lesion morphology. The RS approach, the shortest one, and the ETTA provided a near-tangential visualization of the PTZ, whereas the ETOA offered a more perpendicular surgical view.
conclusionsA thorough understanding of the anatomical and technical nuances of the three approaches to the PTZ described in this study can support the selection of the most appropriate surgical route for pontine lesions. Comparative data suggest that the orientation of the lesion's major axis within the pons is a key criterion in determining the optimal surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.