Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41762299›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

Thematic knowledge survives visual crowding and influences object identification.

Nicolas Slaski, Bilge Sayim, Solène Kalénine

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolas SlaskiUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Lille, F - 59000, France.
Bilge SayimUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Lille, F - 59000, France.
Solène KalénineUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Lille, F - 59000, France. solene.kalenine@univ-lille.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-23-CE28-0015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Object perception is challenged in complex and cluttered visual environments. This phenomenon, known as visual crowding, occurs when object identification is impaired because a target is surrounded by other objects. However, visual environments are meaningful, and objects are often arranged in coherent and predictable ways. In particular, thematic relations linking objects that play complementary roles in events (e.g., hammer–nail) facilitate conceptual processing, especially for manipulable objects. However, it remains unclear whether such semantic relations can also influence perceptual processes. This study investigated whether thematic information can be processed under visual crowding and facilitate object identification in clutter. Participants were briefly presented with pairs of object images in peripheral vision and performed an object identification task. The object pairs were either thematically related or unrelated, and correctly positioned for being used together or not. Objects were presented either in isolation or crowded by meaningless flankers. Experiment 1 demonstrated that objects in thematically related pairs were identified more accurately than those in unrelated pairs, even under crowding. Experiment 2 showed that the thematic benefit may occur at the decisional stage for isolated objects, thematic grouping may arise in crowding conditions. Experiment 3 provided a single-object baseline and indicated that thematic relatedness reduced the interference caused by object presentation in pairs. Overall, findings suggest that semantic knowledge involving the use of manipulable objects can survive visual crowding and influence object recognition. They support an embodied view of perception, according to which action-related semantic knowledge can modulate relatively early stages of visual processing.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSemanticsYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.