Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41762293›Full record

Trial reportPsychological research2026

Acceptance or distraction first while suffering acute pain? Order effects on visual attention to external painful stimuli.

Elena Robles, Iván Blanco, Carmelo Vázquez

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena RoblesDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-4794
Iván BlancoDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-5814
Carmelo VázquezDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. cvazquez@ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1796-2161

Funding

Ministry of Science PID2019-108711GB-I00Universidad Complutense de Madrid CT82/20-CT83/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study examines attention to pain-related facial expressions in healthy individuals during a cold pain induction, as well as the efficacy of acceptance- or distraction-based instructions in modifying attentional patterns during the induction.

methodSixty pain-free participants completed an attentional task to analyse attentional biases towards pain-related facial expressions (Stage 1). Immediately afterwards, they performed a Cold Pressor Task (CPT) to obtain pain-related measures. Then, participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (n = 30), which performed the attentional task with cold water (acute pain condition), or a control group (n = 30), which performed the task with room-temperature water (Stage 2). Finally, both groups performed the same attentional task and were instructed to use two different coping strategies -acceptance and distraction-in a counterbalanced order under cold-pain conditions (Stage 3).

resultsAttentional biases to pain stimuli were found under pain-free conditions. The cold pain induction did not increase attention to pain-related stimuli; instead, it decreased attention to both pain and neutral stimuli. Regarding the efficacy of the guided coping strategies, acceptance followed by distraction (but not the reverse) significantly reduced attention to pain-related information. DISCUSSION: This study confirms the presence of attentional biases in pain-free individuals. However, the pain induction task reduced attention to both pain and neutral stimuli. More importantly, our study also showed that the order in which strategies are employed to cope with painful sensations is crucial for modifying attentional biases. This order effect might be a relevant mechanism that could inform future psychological interventions to treat pain. PERSPECTIVE: This study confirms that individuals without pain show attentional biases to pain-related information. In terms of coping strategies, we found a beneficial effect of using pain acceptance followed by distraction, not the other way around, to reduce attention to pain-related stimuli in an acute pain state. This finding of an order effect of coping strategies could be relevant for guiding psychological interventions on pain.

Indexed as

Acute PainAdaptation, PsychologicalAttentionAttentional BiasFacial ExpressionAdultCold TemperatureCoping SkillsFemaleHumansMalePain PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.