ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Real world outcomes and prognostic factors in Chinese patients with primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma: A single center experience and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results validation.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors of Chinese patients with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). We retrospectively reviewed 69 consecutive patients with PMBCL treated at our center between 2010 and 2025. External validation was performed using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (n = 1,460). The median age at diagnosis was 33 years (range, 18–62), with a female predominance (female-to-male ratio, 2.1:1). Most patients (92.8%, 64/69) received R-DA-EPOCH as frontline therapy, and 29.0% (20/69) additionally underwent consolidative radiotherapy (RT). Among 51 evaluable patients, the objective response rate was 90.2%, with a complete response rate of 74.5%. After a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 2–166), the estimated 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in whole cohort were 88.7% and 94.8%, respectively. Hematologic toxicity, predominantly febrile neutropenia, was the most common adverse event; nevertheless, 60.4% of patients maintained a relative dose intensity ≥ 100%. Consolidative RT did not confer a survival advantage, whereas age > 40 years emerged as an adverse prognostic factor for OS, a finding further validated in the SEER cohort. Chinese patients with PMBCL generally have favorable outcomes in the modern treatment era. However, older age (> 40 years) is associated with inferior survival. The R-DA-EPOCH regimen demonstrated high efficacy in this real-world setting, whereas additionally consolidative RT failed to provide a significant survival benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.