ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Can Pre-Contraction of the Pelvic Floor Muscles Exceed Increases in Intra-Abdominal Pressure During Strength Exercises?
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisA recent study found that young power and weightlifters reported a high prevalence of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) with urinary incontinence (UI) 50%, anal incontinence 80% and pelvic organ prolapse 23%. Performing "the knack", a voluntary pre-contraction of the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs), before and during stressful events, can prevent UI during coughing and daily activities. However, the effect of this manoeuvre has not been investigated during strenuous exercises. This study was aimed at investigating the feasibility of using the femfit® to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and PFM pressure during strength exercises and at discovering if a voluntary pre-contraction of the PFMs can exceed increases in IAP during strength exercises.
methodsThis was a short-term, cross-sectional, experimental study. Eleven participants were tested in squat, deadlift, leg press and curl up, performed in a random order with and without voluntary pre-contraction of the PFMs. Assessment of the ability to contract the PFMs was conducted by suprapubic 2D ultrasound. IAP and PFM pressure were measured with the femfit®. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to estimate differences in change between IAP and PFM pressure with and without voluntary pre-contraction during the strength exercises.
resultsNo participants reported displacement or discomfort from the femfit® device. Voluntary pre-contraction of the PFMs did not exceed the rise in IAP during squat, deadlift, leg press and curl up.
conclusionsThe PFM pressure was not significantly higher than the IAP during strength exercises. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to investigate if systematic PFM training can improve the strength of the voluntary pre-contraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.