Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41762131›Full record

ArticleGenetics2026

Detecting and quantifying networks of biological kinship via exponential family random graph models.

Adam B Rohrlach, Guido Alberto Gnecchi-Ruscone, Zuzana Hofmanová, Zsófia Rácz, Matthew Roughan, Wolfgang Haak, Jonathan Tuke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam B RohrlachDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4204-5018
Guido Alberto Gnecchi-RusconeArchaeo- and Palaeogenetics, Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz, Tübingen 72074, Germany.
Zuzana HofmanováDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Zsófia RáczInstitute of Archaeological Sciences, ELTE - Eötvös Loránd University, Múzeum krt. 4/B, Budapest 1088, Hungary.
Matthew RoughanSchool of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace campus, Adelaide 5005, Australia.
Wolfgang HaakDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Jonathan TukeSchool of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace campus, Adelaide 5005, Australia.

Funding

European Research Council 101141408-ROAMANCEEuropean Research Council 856453-HistoGenes
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic relatedness between ancient humans can help to identify close and distant connections between groups and populations, uncovering signatures of demographic histories such as identifying mating networks or long-range migration. Critical to researchers are the characteristics that connected individuals, or groups of individuals, share, and how these characteristics interact and are correlated. Here we use Exponential Random Graph models as a method to explore demographic and contextual parameters that may help to explain the significant drivers of the topology of mating networks, as well as to quantify their effects. We show through simulations that model selection and coefficient estimators facilitate the exploration of such networks, and apply the method to individuals from a collection of Avar-associated cemeteries from the Carpathian Basin dating to the 6th to the 9th centuries CE.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationModels, GeneticHumansPedigreeGenetic relatedness; Kinship; IBD

Identifiers

PMID41762131
PMCPMC13050185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.