SynthesisThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2026
Efficacy of manual therapy by different healthcare professionals on pain and function in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManual therapy is widely used in temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD), but its effectiveness across different professional practices and techniques remains unclear. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate the efficacy of manual therapy in alleviating pain and improving functional recovery in patients with different TMD subtypes, considering the roles of various healthcare professionals.
methodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Science to identify RCTs presenting participants with a diagnosis of TMD, manual therapies as interventions; other therapeutic modalities, placebo, or sham therapy as comparisons; pain intensity and maximum mouth opening (MMO) as outcomes.
resultsFrom 561 initial records, 18 RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Overall, manual therapy was associated with reductions in pain and improvements in MMO across different professional background and techniques. However, the certainty of evidence was limited, and effects were predominantly observed in the short term. Physiotherapists in rehabilitation settings showed the most consistent outcomes, particularly documented in Brazil. Chiropractic approaches were common in Australia, USA, and England, while Japan focused on intra-oral manipulations by dental and maxillofacial specialists. Italy, Spain, Greece and Turkey stand out for their interdisciplinary approach independently by chiropractors, physiotherapists, or osteopaths in TMD management.
conclusionsThis systematic review suggests that manual therapy may be associated with short-term improvements. Variability in techniques, professional settings, and study designs precludes firm conclusions regarding long-term effectiveness or superiority of specific approaches. Physiotherapy manipulation emerged as the most used technique. Further research should explore long-term outcomes and multiprofessional collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.