Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41762058›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2026

Machine learning to optimize precision in the analysis of randomized trials: A journey in pre-specified, yet data-adaptive learning.

Laura B Balzer, Mark J van der Laan, Maya L Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura B BalzerDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-410X
Mark J van der LaanDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Maya L PetersenDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

A Multisectoral Strategy to Address Persistent Drivers of the HIV Epidemic in East AfricaU01AI150510 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HAVLIR, DIANE V, KAMYA, MOSES ROBERT · 2020 to 2025
$23.4M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI150510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covariate adjustment is an approach to improve the precision of trial analyses by adjusting for baseline variables that are prognostic of the primary endpoint. Motivated by the SEARCH Universal HIV Test-and-Treat Trial (2013-2017), we tell our story of developing, evaluating, and implementing a machine learning-based approach for covariate adjustment. We provide the rationale for as well as the practical concerns with such an approach for estimating marginal effects. Using schematics, we illustrate our procedure: targeted machine learning estimation (TMLE) with Adaptive Pre-specification. Briefly, sample-splitting is used to data-adaptively select the combination of estimators of the outcome regression (i.e. the conditional expectation of the outcome given the trial arm and covariates) and known propensity score (i.e. the conditional probability of being randomized to the intervention given the covariates) that minimizes the cross-validated variance estimate and, thereby, maximizes empirical efficiency. We discuss our approach for evaluating finite sample performance with parametric and plasmode simulations, pre-specifying the Statistical Analysis Plan, and unblinding in real-time on video conference with our colleagues from around the world. We present the results from applying our approach in the primary, pre-specified analysis of eight recently published trials (2022-2024). We conclude with practical recommendations and an invitation to implement our approach in the primary analysis of your next trial.

Indexed as

Adaptive AlgorithmsMachine LearningData Interpretation, StatisticalHIV InfectionsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignAdaptive pre-specificationcovariate adjustmentefficiencyempirical efficiency maximizationmachine learningprecisionpre-specificationrandomized trialsTMLE

Identifiers

PMID41762058
PMCPMC12952679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.