Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761862›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Addressing multiple pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: Current status, challenges, and solutions.

Xi Wu, Yu Liang, Xiaoling Yang, Fangjie Jiang, Yabin Chen, Zhaoqing Zhang, Hao Zha, Jie Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xi WuReproductive Center the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yu LiangReproductive Center the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Xiaoling YangReproductive Center the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Fangjie JiangReproductive Center the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yabin ChenReproductive Center the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Zhaoqing ZhangReproductive Center the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Hao ZhaReproductive Center the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Jie YangReproductive Center the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2622-5606

Funding

Clinical Research Project of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University ynIIT2022016Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province 202501AY070001-183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rising global incidence of infertility and the growing proportion of infants conceived via in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET), multiple pregnancies have emerged as a prominent and pressing challenge in assisted reproductive technology. This review synthesizes evidence from clinical, ethical, and technological research to comprehensively analyze the current status and underlying causes of and the potential solutions to this issue. Despite global efforts to curb it, the multiple pregnancy rate in IVF-ET remains persistently high, with significant regional disparities primarily driven by variations in the adoption of single embryo transfer (SET), a key strategy for reducing multiple pregnancies. The widespread implementation of SET is hindered by a long-standing clinical dilemma: its lower clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) compared to double embryo transfer (DET), which leads clinicians and patients to prefer DET despite the associated risks. The fundamental resolution to this impasse lies in enhancing the accuracy of embryonic developmental potential assessment. Currently, two technological directions show substantial promise: the integration of time-lapse imaging with artificial intelligence for objective morphological and kinetic evaluation, and the continuous advancement of molecular biology techniques (e.g., non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing and multi-omics-based biomarker screening). While no transformative breakthroughs have been achieved to date, the ongoing refinement of these technologies, coupled with standardized clinical practices and multicenter validation, offers significant potential to optimize SET success rates, narrow the CPR gap with DET, and ultimately address the multiple pregnancy challenge in IVF-ET at its source.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferFertilization in VitroPregnancy, MultipleFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy RatePreimplantation DiagnosisSingle Embryo Transferembryonic developmental potential assessmentin vitro fertilization‐embryo transfermultiple pregnanciesselective fetal reductionsingle embryo transfer

Identifiers

PMID41761862
PMCPMC13377346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.