ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026
Addressing multiple pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: Current status, challenges, and solutions.
Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rising global incidence of infertility and the growing proportion of infants conceived via in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET), multiple pregnancies have emerged as a prominent and pressing challenge in assisted reproductive technology. This review synthesizes evidence from clinical, ethical, and technological research to comprehensively analyze the current status and underlying causes of and the potential solutions to this issue. Despite global efforts to curb it, the multiple pregnancy rate in IVF-ET remains persistently high, with significant regional disparities primarily driven by variations in the adoption of single embryo transfer (SET), a key strategy for reducing multiple pregnancies. The widespread implementation of SET is hindered by a long-standing clinical dilemma: its lower clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) compared to double embryo transfer (DET), which leads clinicians and patients to prefer DET despite the associated risks. The fundamental resolution to this impasse lies in enhancing the accuracy of embryonic developmental potential assessment. Currently, two technological directions show substantial promise: the integration of time-lapse imaging with artificial intelligence for objective morphological and kinetic evaluation, and the continuous advancement of molecular biology techniques (e.g., non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing and multi-omics-based biomarker screening). While no transformative breakthroughs have been achieved to date, the ongoing refinement of these technologies, coupled with standardized clinical practices and multicenter validation, offers significant potential to optimize SET success rates, narrow the CPR gap with DET, and ultimately address the multiple pregnancy challenge in IVF-ET at its source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.