ArticlePlant physiology2026
Physiological and transcriptomic assessment of Arabidopsis identifies two distinct gravity signaling systems.
Article in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gravity beyond starch: molecular evidence for a parallel gravity sensing mechanism.Plant physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plants employ multiple sensing and signaling mechanisms to inform their growth. Earth's gravity is a constant force, which plants perceive and use to direct growth. Despite the ubiquity of gravitropism in plants, the mechanism for signal initiation remains a point of debate. The starch statolith hypothesis suggests that dense amyloplasts sediment within perceptive cells to initiate signaling. However, the persistence of gravitropism in starchless pgm-1 mutants of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) suggests that plants still sense gravity even without amyloplast sedimentation, hinting toward a second mechanism by which plants can perceive gravity. In an attempt to isolate this mechanism, we exposed seedlings to a range of fractional gravities from 0.003 to 1 g; this showed that plants without starch require a much larger force to induce gravitropic signaling than those with starch-filled statoliths. We used the difference in final root angle between genotypes after simultaneous application of blue light and gravity to estimate the relative contributions of the two systems to gravity sensing, demonstrating that starchless signaling can produce 51.7% of the wild-type response. Transcriptomics across the gravity gradient showed a distinctive shift in RNA regulation coinciding with the force required for starchless response. Mutants of these highly regulated genes showed gravity-specific defects and were largely involved in cell-to-cell communication and extracellular signaling. These data provide molecular evidence for both starch-dependent and starch-independent gravity signaling within a vascular plant, as well as the molecular components used in the starch-independent response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.