Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761625›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

A Plug-and-Play Volume Minimizing Micromixer.

Kirill Kolesnik, Philipp Segeritz, Daniel J Scott, David J Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirill KolesnikDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Philipp SegeritzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel J ScottThe Florey Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
David J CollinsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5382-9718

Funding

Australian Research Council DP230102550National Health and Medical Research Council APP2003446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscale fluid mixing has numerous applications where rapid and efficient mixing is required, including drug discovery, bio-analysis and point-of-care diagnostics. Conventional soft lithography processes, however, make the integration of robust and reliable mixing difficult to implement in practice, especially across different flow rates. Here a 3D-printed plug-in micromixer designed for rapid and modular integration with microfluidic devices that addresses long-standing integration challenges for micromixing in microfluidic devices is presented. The micromixer is based on the split-and-recombine (SAR) channel topology employing an optimized 3D geometry, minimizing internal volume and fluidic resistance. A micromixer with 60-µm internal channels is fabricated and experimentally tested, demonstrating efficient mixing while maintaining a reliable seal with a PDMS microfluidic device. Accordingly, the modular micromixing device enhances the efficiency and usability of microfluidic systems, offering a promising solution for biomedical and analytical applications. This conceptually elegant plug-in approach represents a unique advance in the practical integration of 3D printed functionality with microfluidics devices.

Indexed as

3D printinglab‐on‐a‐chipmicrofluidicsmicromixer

Identifiers

PMID41761625
PMCPMC13170216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.