ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Predicting Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Response Using an AI-Based Tumor Vessel Biomarker.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionAbnormal tumor vasculature impairs oxygen delivery and induces hypoxia, contributing to treatment resistance and poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although radiation therapy can modulate tumor vessels, its effects vary widely due to vascular heterogeneity. Therefore, a reliable and noninvasive method to quantify vascular abnormality is needed to better predict treatment outcomes.MethodsWe developed a deep learning-based imaging biomarker, the Vessel Risk Score (VRS), to quantify tumor vascular abnormality from contrast-enhanced CT scans. Trained on multi-institutional data from 126 NSCLC patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy, the model learned vascular morphology patterns from tumor-vessel images. Using these learned patterns, vascular heterogeneity was quantified as the distributional difference from normal vessel morphology. The generalizability of VRS was then evaluated in an external cohort of 128 early-stage NSCLC patients who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).ResultsVRS showed significantly better prediction of SBRT radiation therapy response compared to vessel density. The VRS of the responder group was 0.494 (95% CI: 0.47-0.52), significantly lower than the non-responder group's 0.578 (95% CI: 0.54-0.62). Additionally, patients with high VRS showed significantly shorter PFS compared to those with low VRS (p < 0.05). In Cox multivariate analysis, VRS emerged as the only significant predictor among vessel density and other clinical variables (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe proposed AI-derived VRS provides a noninvasive and reproducible measure of tumor vascular abnormality, offering improved prediction of radiation therapy response and prognosis compared with vessel density. This approach may extend to prognostic assessment in other cancer types where vascular morphology plays a critical role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.