Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761486›Full record

Trial reportCancer2026

A trial of risk-adapted prostate cancer screening in a federally supported health center network serving a high-risk population.

Peter H Gann, Nathan Stackhouse, Nicole Gastala, Weiwei Ma, Margaret E Wright, Karriem Watson, Christopher Stepping, Patrice King-Lee, Ziqiao Xu, Tushar Patel and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04782713 (Smart PSA Screening Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04782713 nacompletednot on this map

Smart PSA Screening Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoRan2021 to 2024Enrolled49ConditionsPSA, Prostate CancerArmsCompleting surveys
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peter H GannDepartment of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9439-2900
Nathan StackhouseDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Nicole GastalaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Weiwei MaUniversity of Illinois Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Margaret E WrightUniversity of Illinois Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Karriem WatsonMile Square Health Center, UI Health, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christopher SteppingBusiness Intelligence, UI Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Patrice King-LeeDepartment of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ziqiao XuUniversity of Illinois Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Tushar PatelDepartment of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Michael R AbernDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough Black men experience earlier onset and higher mortality from prostate cancer (PCa), no studies to date have tested interventions that encourage adoption of risk-adapted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. The authors conducted a 15-month trial in clinics serving Chicago communities with high PCa mortality and Black population density. Their objective was to determine the impact of "Smart PSA" guidelines on screening behavior and biopsy outcomes.

methodsThrough presentations, in-clinic reminders, and on-site visits, primary care providers (PCPs) were exposed to basic PSA guidelines recommending starting age, repeat test interval, and stopping age, based on race, family history, and baseline PSA. For the intervention period and a matched control period 3 years earlier, the authors extracted data from clinical databases on all visits by men age 35 and over, at six clinics. The primary end point was change in incidence of a screening PSA linked to a PCP encounter.

resultsA total of 4252 and 4022 patients, similar in age and race, had qualifying encounters during intervention and pre-intervention, respectively. PSA screening following encounters increased from 18.7 to 33.0 per 100 patients (Δ = 14.3; 95% CI, 12.4-16.1) with odds ratio = 2.43 (95% CI, 2.17-2.71), adjusted for pre-specified covariates. Guideline compliance was indicated by a larger increase in screening of younger Black patients, and earlier repeat testing after a borderline PSA. Increased screening of men 70 and older indicated potential noncompliance. Biopsy incidence increased from 0.57 to 0.92 per 100 (Δ = 0.35; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.75), with PCa prevalence at biopsy increasing from 43% to 74%. Total PCa incidence rose 2.7-fold (0.25 to 0.68 per 100, p = .007), with incidence of cancer beyond grade group 1 increasing 3-fold (p = .008).

conclusionThese findings demonstrate that risk-adapted PSA guidelines can be adopted and sustained by PCPs in high-risk settings. Although PCa incidence increased substantially, the predominance of aggressive cancer was unchanged, consistent with the effect of intensified screening in a high-risk population with sparse prior screening for a cancer with long latency. Sustained intensification should eventually cause a new equilibrium, necessitating additional efforts to avoid overdiagnosis.

trial registrationThe trial registration is ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04782713.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiopsyBlack or African AmericanChicagoHumansMaleMass ScreeningMen's Health ServicesMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicProstate-Specific Antigenclinical trialnonrandomizedpopulations at riskprimary careprostate cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID41761486
PMCPMC12949344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.