ReviewJournal of Parkinson's disease2026
When caution becomes neglect: Deep brain stimulation and cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.
Review in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 25 years, a prevailing clinical dogma has held that significant cognitive impairment constitutes a contraindication to the use of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Whilst multiple studies, excluding such patients, have repeatedly emphasised the motoric benefits of this approach, less consideration has been given to the consequences of excluding this cohort. However, emerging evidence suggests that Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease patients with moderate cognitive impairment not only allows for significant reductions in dopaminergic therapy (typically alleviating many non-motor symptoms) but also favours survival and reduced admissions into institutional care. These small studies have not demonstrated significantly increased surgical or stimulation related complications in such patients and would suggest that further prospective studies, specifically evaluating this approach are warranted. Indeed, in the absence of a successful disease modifying therapy, exclusion from Deep Brain Stimulation often commits these advanced patients to a trajectory of ineffective pharmacological complexity. Alternative infusion therapies are associated with high discontinuation rates whilst escalating dopaminergic therapy, frequently exacerbates non-motor complications, including orthostatic hypotension, hallucinations, somnolence, and cognitive fluctuations. This flawed treatment strategy further accelerates functional decline, hospitalisation, and institutionalisation. Therefore, a reluctance or failure to offer Deep Brain Stimulation, where appropriate, may inadvertently consign patients to poorer long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.