Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761450›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026

Experiences of Dutch parents undergoing prenatal genomic testing for fetal structural anomalies: A prospective qualitative analysis.

Maayke A de Koning, Sarah Long, Holly E Evans, Lauren Kelada, Gijs W E Santen, Tony Roscioli, Manon Suerink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maayke A de KoningDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0557-7530
Sarah LongNeuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Holly E EvansSchool of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, Discipline of Pediatrics, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lauren KeladaSchool of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, Discipline of Pediatrics, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9428-8807
Gijs W E SantenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1959-3267
Tony RoscioliNeuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1502-5000
Manon SuerinkDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7058-6973

Funding

Leids Universiteits Fonds W232399-2-050Simonsfonds ID:371Vreedesfonds 2023100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) increases the diagnostic rate for genetic disorders in pregnancies with structural abnormalities and substantially impacts parental decision-making regarding pregnancy continuation or termination. Previous qualitative research on parental experiences of pES has typically been performed several months after results were returned to parents. Moreover, parental experiences of pES might be dependent on cultural aspects and country-specific healthcare systems. This research therefore prospectively explores experiences of families undergoing pES in the Netherlands. Expectant parents undergoing pES because of ultrasound anomalies were invited to participate with two interviews: interview T1 after counseling for genetic testing but prior to return of results and interview T2 six  months after return of results. We translated a previously designed Australian interview script, used in similar research, to Dutch, including four open-end and two multiple-choice questions in addition to demographic details. An inductive content analysis approach was used for coding and analysis. Twelve families were interviewed at T1, of which five participants agreed to T2 follow-up interviews. We constructed six content categories of importance: (1) Prenatal feelings of fear, uncertainty, guilt, and anxiety; (2) conflicting feelings in the face of (un)certainty; (3) overall satisfaction with genetic counseling; (4) decision-making influenced by desire for information about their child's quality of life; (5) decision-making influenced by reproductive options and family planning; and (6) importance of empathy, kindness, and clear communication from friends, family, and healthcare professionals. Many content categories show overlap to previous research. However, families in this cohort did not explicitly express negative opinions about waiting on results which is possibly explained by concurrently running multiple genetic testing modalities. Moreover, all participants mentioned positive experiences of the provided healthcare, partly because of swift multidisciplinary collaboration. This study highlights the value of pre-test counseling by clinical geneticists and shows the need for close collaboration between feto-maternal specialists, clinical geneticists, and laboratory specialists.

Indexed as

FetusGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingParentsPrenatal DiagnosisAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsPregnancyProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchReturn of Individual Research Resultsgenetic counselingpatients' experiencesprenatal exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41761450
PMCPMC12949345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.