Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761436›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Home Care Organisational Models in Italy: A Cross-Sectional Study of Cluster Analysis and Stakeholder Perceptions.

Ilaria Marcomini, Valeria Caponnetto, Francesco Zaghini, Manuele Cesare, Marco Di Nitto, Paolo Iovino, Alessandra Burgio, Stefano Domenico Cicala, Annamaria Bagnasco, Giancarlo Cicolini and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ilaria MarcominiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8096-0199
Valeria CaponnettoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4573-6110
Francesco ZaghiniDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-5751
Manuele CesareSection of Hygiene, Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Gemelli IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2834-7594
Marco Di NittoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-622X
Paolo IovinoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-881X
Alessandra BurgioNational Institute of Statistics - ISTAT, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8017-7452
Stefano Domenico CicalaNational Agency for Regional Health Services - AGENAS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2087-3437
Annamaria BagnascoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9079-8460
Giancarlo CicoliniDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara "G. D'annunzio", Chieti, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-1792
Loreto LanciaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2345-1731
Duilio Fiorenzo ManaraVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5182-6994
Laura RaseroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4460-8002
Gennaro RoccoCentre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9211-3752
Maurizio ZegaOrder of Nursing Professions (OPI) of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7821-2615
Beatrice MazzoleniNational General Secretary FNOPI, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3870-1238
Loredana SassoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-5937
Rosaria AlvaroDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4659-1569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo classify Italian home care models based on structural characteristics, process factors and stakeholder perceptions.

designThis is a secondary analysis of the AIDOMUS-IT multicentre cross-sectional study, conducted in Italy between July 2022 and December 2023.

methodsData were collected via online surveys completed by 33 Local Health Authority Nursing Directors, home care nurses and patients. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to classify different organisational models based on structural and process-related factors. Nurses' and patients' perceptions of care were described for each identified cluster.

resultsThe analysis identified three distinct organisational home care models: The 'multidisciplinary model', in which nurses reported high dissatisfaction due to organisational complexity and excessive workloads. In the 'nurse-centred model', characterised by publicly employed nurses, strong leadership, and a supportive work environment, patients reported high levels of satisfaction. The 'performance-based model', which operated with a lower nurse-to-patient ratio, reduced service hours, and greater reliance on external professionals. Nurses in this model reported high job satisfaction but also a greater intention to leave, while patient satisfaction was lower.

conclusionsThis study underscores the importance of leadership, resource management, and a supportive work environment in influencing both job satisfaction and patient outcomes in home care settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENTS CARE: Policymakers could use these findings to refine care models and improve service delivery. IMPACT: Limited research has examined the organisational structures of home care services, which are important for professionals' organisational well-being, patient safety, and quality of care. This study identified three distinct organisational home care models that could be used to refine care approaches and improve service delivery. REPORTING

methodThis study respects the EQUATOR guideline for observational studies (STROBE). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesModels, OrganizationalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedPatient Satisfactioncluster analysishome carejob satisfactionnursingorganisational modelspatient satisfactionresource managementwork environments

Identifiers

PMID41761436
PMCPMC13576784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.