Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761361›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026

Polypharmacy in people with dementia: a nationwide Danish study.

Nelsan Pourhadi, Christina Jensen-Dahm, Thomas Munk Laursen, Christiane Gasse, Gunhild Waldemar, Janet Janbek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nelsan PourhadiDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej, entrance 8, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark. nelsanp@hotmail.com.
Christina Jensen-DahmDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej, entrance 8, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Thomas Munk LaursenNational Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.
Christiane GasseDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark.
Gunhild WaldemarDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej, entrance 8, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Janet JanbekDanish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej, entrance 8, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolypharmacy, particularly central nervous system (CNS)-active polypharmacy, is widespread in individuals with dementia and may accelerate cognitive decline and increase hospitalization and mortality risks. Identifying the extent and trends of polypharmacy is essential for optimizing medication use in this vulnerable population. We examined the prevalence, time trends, and adjusted odds of polypharmacy and CNS-active polypharmacy in older adults with dementia compared to those without dementia.

methodsThe study was a series of nationwide cross-sectional population-based studies based on the national Danish registers. All Danish residents aged ≥ 65 years (N = 1,184,366) were included as of January 1, 2022, including 38,252 individuals with dementia. Dementia, along with somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, was identified through hospital diagnoses, while medication use was assessed based on filled prescriptions. Historical trends were examined from 2012 to 2022. Dementia was based on diagnoses or dementia-specific medication use. Polypharmacy was defined as concurrent use of ≥ 5 medications, and CNS-active polypharmacy as ≥ 3 CNS-active drugs (antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, anxiolytics, hypnotics, or opioids). Age- and sex-standardized prevalences were calculated by direct standardization. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for polypharmacy and CNS-active polypharmacy were estimated using logistic regression.

resultsAmong 1,184,366 individuals in 2022, 38,252 (3.2%) had dementia (59.4% female) with median age of 82 years (IQR, 77–87 years). Polypharmacy was identified in 56.2% of those with dementia, compared to 35.6% without dementia, fully adjusted OR, 1.47 (95% CI, 1.44–1.51). CNS-active polypharmacy was observed in 10.1% of individuals with dementia and 2.3% of those without, fully adjusted OR, 2.70 (95% CI, 2.59–2.81). Cardiovascular medications were the most frequently used among individuals with dementia experiencing polypharmacy. For CNS-active polypharmacy, antidepressants, opioids, and antipsychotics were most common. Between 2012 and 2022, polypharmacy prevalence in dementia declined from 65.1% to 56.2%, and CNS-active polypharmacy from 15.0% to 10.1%. Patterns differed by living situation with dementia being linked to higher polypharmacy in community-dwelling individuals but lower in nursing homes.

conclusionsWhile polypharmacy and CNS-active polypharmacy in dementia have declined over the past decade, likely influenced by targeted safer prescribing initiatives, they remain disproportionately high in individuals with dementia. The findings reinforce the need for continued interventions to support safe medication use in dementia care.

Indexed as

DementiaPolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRegistriesAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsDementiaEpidemiologyMedication useNursing homePolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID41761361
PMCPMC13049764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.