ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Polypharmacy in people with dementia: a nationwide Danish study.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolypharmacy, particularly central nervous system (CNS)-active polypharmacy, is widespread in individuals with dementia and may accelerate cognitive decline and increase hospitalization and mortality risks. Identifying the extent and trends of polypharmacy is essential for optimizing medication use in this vulnerable population. We examined the prevalence, time trends, and adjusted odds of polypharmacy and CNS-active polypharmacy in older adults with dementia compared to those without dementia.
methodsThe study was a series of nationwide cross-sectional population-based studies based on the national Danish registers. All Danish residents aged ≥ 65 years (N = 1,184,366) were included as of January 1, 2022, including 38,252 individuals with dementia. Dementia, along with somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, was identified through hospital diagnoses, while medication use was assessed based on filled prescriptions. Historical trends were examined from 2012 to 2022. Dementia was based on diagnoses or dementia-specific medication use. Polypharmacy was defined as concurrent use of ≥ 5 medications, and CNS-active polypharmacy as ≥ 3 CNS-active drugs (antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, anxiolytics, hypnotics, or opioids). Age- and sex-standardized prevalences were calculated by direct standardization. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for polypharmacy and CNS-active polypharmacy were estimated using logistic regression.
resultsAmong 1,184,366 individuals in 2022, 38,252 (3.2%) had dementia (59.4% female) with median age of 82 years (IQR, 77–87 years). Polypharmacy was identified in 56.2% of those with dementia, compared to 35.6% without dementia, fully adjusted OR, 1.47 (95% CI, 1.44–1.51). CNS-active polypharmacy was observed in 10.1% of individuals with dementia and 2.3% of those without, fully adjusted OR, 2.70 (95% CI, 2.59–2.81). Cardiovascular medications were the most frequently used among individuals with dementia experiencing polypharmacy. For CNS-active polypharmacy, antidepressants, opioids, and antipsychotics were most common. Between 2012 and 2022, polypharmacy prevalence in dementia declined from 65.1% to 56.2%, and CNS-active polypharmacy from 15.0% to 10.1%. Patterns differed by living situation with dementia being linked to higher polypharmacy in community-dwelling individuals but lower in nursing homes.
conclusionsWhile polypharmacy and CNS-active polypharmacy in dementia have declined over the past decade, likely influenced by targeted safer prescribing initiatives, they remain disproportionately high in individuals with dementia. The findings reinforce the need for continued interventions to support safe medication use in dementia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.