Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761344›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2026

Reducing sedentary behavior through workplace counseling: effects on activity, sitting breaks, and well-being - a randomized controlled trial.

Tobias Engeroff, Larissa Kraus, Jan Wilke, Daniel Niederer, David Groneberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tobias Engeroff *Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. engeroff@sport.uni-frankfurt.de.
Larissa Kraus *Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Jan WilkeDepartment of Neuromotor Function and Movement, University Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Daniel NiedererInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
David GronebergInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increase in hybrid-work or work-from-home demands setting-specific strategies to improve health-promoting behaviors. This study compared the effects of a behavioral intervention based on individualized workplace counseling to an educational approach based on a standardized factsheet.

methodsUniversity employees (n = 121) were randomly allocated to three groups receiving: (1) a factsheet visualizing the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behavior, (2) 20 min of individualized counseling tailored to individual barriers, opportunities, and personal strengths, or (3) no advice (control group). Physical activity (minutes per week) and sedentary behavior (minutes per day) during leisure- and occupational time were assessed before and 4 weeks after interventions using the Nordic Physical Activity Questionnaire. Further outcomes were well-being (WHO-5 questionnaire), pain intensity, and pain interference with work (both with the Short Form 36 Health Survey). Descriptive data are indicated as mean and standard deviation, and the effects of the interventions were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA).

resultsThe participants (age 43.6, 12.2 years, body mass index 24.3, 3.9 kg/m²) showed high levels of leisure-time physical activity (294.30, 215.37 min) and moderate levels of sedentary behavior (504.33, 158.82 min) at baseline. Overall, physical activity levels (32.37, 112.51 min) and especially vigorous intensity levels (3.88, 19.64 min) at work were low. A large share of daily sedentary time was accumulated during work (414.05, 105.19 min). The individualized counseling group decreased workplace sedentary time (-30.73, 81.74 min), compared to the factsheet (0.00, 54.35 min) and control groups (+ 6.00, 72.92 min), and increased workplace vigorous intensity activity (+ 10.24, 43.10 min), compared to the factsheet (+ 0.50, 3.16 min) and control group (-6.75, 28.77 min) (p<.05). No intervention showed any effect on leisure activity levels, well-being or perceived bodily pain (p>.05).

conclusionAn individualized approach to setting-specific physical activity counseling improves health-promoting behaviors in physically active persons with sedentary occupations.

trial registrationRegistered at the German Clinical Trial Register: drks.de (registration number: DRKS00031671; 04 Feb 2025). Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Behavioral interventionHybrid workIndividualized counselingSedentary behaviorWorkplace physical activity

Identifiers

PMID41761344
PMCPMC13059149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.