Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761324›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026

Shaping the future of spinal implants: advancing bioactive composites with 3D printing for next-generation surgical care.

Naresh Kumar, Namith Rangaswamy, Si Jian Hui, Lionel Yan Jin Lee, Praveen Jeyachandran, Niyou Wang, Jerry Ying Hsi Fuh, A Senthil Kumar, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Balamurugan A Vellayappan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Naresh KumarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System Tower Block, Level 11, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. dosksn@nus.edu.sg.
Namith RangaswamyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System Tower Block, Level 11, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Si Jian HuiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System Tower Block, Level 11, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Lionel Yan Jin LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Singapore, Level 11, Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Praveen JeyachandranDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Singapore, Level 11, Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Niyou WangInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis 08-03, Singapore, 138634, Singapore.
Jerry Ying Hsi FuhDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117575, Singapore.
A Senthil KumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore, 117575, Singapore.
James Thomas Patrick Decourcy HallinanDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, National University Hospital, Main Building, Level 2, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.
Balamurugan A VellayappanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Health System, Level 7, Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.

Funding

National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Cluster M22N2K00004National Medical Research Council MOH-001096-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of spinal implant materials must keep pace with advances in our understanding of bone biomechanics and changing clinical demands in spine surgery. While early innovations primarily addressed trauma and spinal deformities using titanium alloys as the gold standard, an aging population has led to an increasing detection of osteoporosis and metastatic spine disease. These conditions fundamentally alter bone quality and mechanical behaviour and pose significant challenges for traditional metallic implants. These are not only due to stress shielding and increased risk of failure in compromised bone but also their radiopacity, which produces imaging artifacts that obscure anatomical detail and complicate disease monitoring and radiotherapy. Innovations in advanced polymers, bioactive material integrations, and additive manufacturing have delivered a glimpse into the next generation of implants tailored to the multifaceted demands of modern spinal surgery. This paper studies the evolution of spinal pathologies to deliver the guided engineering of future implant materials that offer optimal mechanical compatibility, biological integrability, radiological advantages, and allow for enhanced processibility and customization for patient-specific applications. This paradigm shift promises improved implant longevity, enhanced biological response, superior imaging and radiotherapy outcomes, and greater potential for personalized solutions to ultimately advance care for patients with osteoporosis, metastatic disease, and other complex spinal conditions.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsPrinting, Three-DimensionalProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis DesignSpinal DiseasesSpineAnimalsForecastingHumansOsteoporosisBiocompatible MaterialsAdditive manufacturingMetastatic spine diseaseOsteoporosisPEEKSpine implants

Identifiers

PMID41761324
PMCPMC13059470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.