ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Shaping the future of spinal implants: advancing bioactive composites with 3D printing for next-generation surgical care.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evolution of spinal implant materials must keep pace with advances in our understanding of bone biomechanics and changing clinical demands in spine surgery. While early innovations primarily addressed trauma and spinal deformities using titanium alloys as the gold standard, an aging population has led to an increasing detection of osteoporosis and metastatic spine disease. These conditions fundamentally alter bone quality and mechanical behaviour and pose significant challenges for traditional metallic implants. These are not only due to stress shielding and increased risk of failure in compromised bone but also their radiopacity, which produces imaging artifacts that obscure anatomical detail and complicate disease monitoring and radiotherapy. Innovations in advanced polymers, bioactive material integrations, and additive manufacturing have delivered a glimpse into the next generation of implants tailored to the multifaceted demands of modern spinal surgery. This paper studies the evolution of spinal pathologies to deliver the guided engineering of future implant materials that offer optimal mechanical compatibility, biological integrability, radiological advantages, and allow for enhanced processibility and customization for patient-specific applications. This paradigm shift promises improved implant longevity, enhanced biological response, superior imaging and radiotherapy outcomes, and greater potential for personalized solutions to ultimately advance care for patients with osteoporosis, metastatic disease, and other complex spinal conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.