ArticleBMC psychology2026
How does the mentor guidance function affect graduate students' scientific research and innovation ability? Mediating role of scientific research self-efficacy.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the expanding population of graduate students, enhancing scientific research and innovation ability has become a central concern in graduate education research. This study examines how the mentor guidance function influences graduate students’ scientific research and innovation ability, focusing on the mediating role of scientific research self-efficacy.
methodUsing convenience sampling, a total of 1,000 Chinese graduate students were surveyed, yielding 904 valid responses. Confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, and mediation analysis were conducted to examine the relationships among mentor guidance function, scientific research self-efficacy, and scientific research and innovation ability.
resultThe results indicate that: (1) The mentor’s guidance function has a significant positive impact on graduate students’ scientific research and innovation ability (β = 0.362, t = 15.077, p < 0. 001), with the career development and social support dimensions demonstrating particularly strong effects; (2) The mentor’s guidance function has a significant positive impact on scientific research self-efficacy(β = 0.468, t = 19.573, p < 0. 001); (3) Scientific research self-efficacy has a significant positive impact on graduate students’ scientific research and innovation ability(β = 0.700, t = 29.084, p < 0. 001); (4) Scientific research self-efficacy mediates the relationship between the mentor’s guidance function and graduate students’ scientific research and innovation ability within the current cross-sectional model (CI = [-0.006, 0.075], containing zero).
conclusionThis study clarifies the psychological mechanism through which mentor guidance function enhances graduate students’ scientific research and innovation ability. The findings highlight that mentoring effectiveness operates primarily through strengthening students’ scientific research self-efficacy, suggesting that universities should focus on building structured mentoring systems that foster students’ research confidence and perceived competence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.