ArticleBMC nursing2026
Forwarding information and communication within collaboratives: exploring the perceptions of Heads of Nursing and Allied Health Professionals.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternal communication is crucial in today’s corporate world, ensuring alignment with organizational goals and enhancing performance. However, organizational complexity and lack of standardization may hinder this effectiveness. The transmission of information from top to bottom is a critical element in ensuring effective, timely communication across hierarchical levels. The aim of this study was to analyse the process of top-down communication from Heads of Nursing and Allied Health Professionals to Healthcare Workers in hospital care units, with the specific purpose of identifying challenges and strategies to inform the design of a structured quality improvement project on internal communication.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study using a content analysis approach was conducted between June and July 2024 in a large university hospital in Northern Italy. Nineteen Heads of Nursing and Allied Health Professionals with at least two years of experience were recruited using purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded after participants provided written consent, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using content analysis by two independent researchers.
resultsThe analysis highlighted five main categories: (1) use of software applications for the transmission of information, (2) time management for the transmission of information, (3) use of feedback as a verification strategy, (4) contextualization of information in the care unit, and (5) the uncertainty on the effectiveness of official communication channels. The primary channels of communication are formal tools such as email and meetings, while instant messaging apps are used to disseminate urgent alerts. The effective management of time in the transmission of information is regarded as a crucial aspect. Feedback is used as a strategy to verify effective reception and understanding of information. Nevertheless, uncertainty persists about the effectiveness of official channels.
conclusionTo enhance internal communication, it is vital to strike a balance between technological efficiency and the well-being of Heads of Nursing and Allied Health Professionals, while guaranteeing the quality of care, adopting structured feedback practices, and contextualising information. An integrated approach that combines informal technologies and traditional methods is essential to address operational challenges and improve information management in the healthcare sector. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.