ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Ethnobotanical insights into rheumatoid arthritis management: indigenous herbal practices from Kutch, Gujarat, India.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by systemic inflammation and progressive joint degeneration. This survey was conducted to address a knowledge gap regarding the ethnomedicinal practices of indigenous communities in Kutch, Gujarat, specifically for the management of RA. Although RA is a globally prevalent condition, documentation of locally used medicinal plants and their preparation methods remains limited, particularly in arid regions where access to modern healthcare is restricted. Systematic documentation of this knowledge allows for the assessment of cultural consensus on plant use and the identification of species with therapeutic potential, which may guide future pharmacological research and integrative treatment strategies. The present study aimed to systematically document and analyse the ethnomedicinal knowledge of plants used for RA among indigenous communities in Kutch, Gujarat, and to quantitatively evaluate their ethnobotanical significance, cultural consensus, and usage patterns using Informant Consensus Factor (ICF), Use Value (UV), and Fidelity Level (FL).
methodsAn ethnobotanical study was conducted in the Kutch district of Gujarat between December 2022 and December 2023, employing a cross-sectional survey design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 162 participants, including 86 key informants recognized for their traditional knowledge of plant-based therapies for RA. Information was documented on plant species used, specific parts utilized, preparation methods, and routes of administration. Quantitative indices including Informant Consensus Factor (ICF), Use Value (UV) and Fidelity Level (FL)were calculated to assess ethnobotanical significance and cultural consensus.
resultsA total of 155 plant species were reported for the management of RA. The most frequently represented families were Fabaceae, Malvaceae, and Convolvulaceae. Whole plants (50.7%) and leaves (38.2%) were the most commonly used parts. Predominant preparation methods were decoction (Kwatha, 62.5%) and paste (Kalka, 40.97%). High ICF and FL values indicate strong cultural consensus and specificity of use among several species. DISCUSSION: This study underscores the rich ethnobotanical heritage of the Kutch region, particularly in relation to traditional plant-based therapies for RA. The documented knowledge reflects a culturally embedded, experience-based system with significant potential for developing integrative or complementary therapeutic strategies. However, comprehensive pharmacological, phytochemical, and toxicological evaluations are necessary to scientifically validate these traditional claims. Future interdisciplinary research may facilitate the translation of this indigenous knowledge into evidence-based applications in modern rheumatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.