ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Comprehensive review of acromioclavicular joint dislocation: anatomy, mechanism, imaging, treatment and rehabilitation-narrative review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acromioclavicular Joint (ACJ) dislocation is a major form of shoulder injury, accounting for about 9% of shoulder injuries. It is commonly seen in athletes involved in direct oppositional, contact sports (e.g., field hockey, rugby, and soccer.) The ACJ plays a critical role in normal upper extremity motion function, but intense opposition, as well as its structural complexity, make it susceptible to acute injury and dysfunction. Therefore, it is of great interest to explore the anatomical basis of ACJ dislocations, analyze the mechanisms by which such ACJ dislocations occur, and discuss in detail how imaging techniques can be used to assess the extent of injury. In this review, we explore the aforementioned processes and mechanisms, as well as the treatment options for ACJ dislocation, with a focus on how to differentiate between surgical and nonsurgical treatment methods. The considerations for ACJ treatment are also further elaborated by comparing the effectiveness and potential complications of the various treatment methods. Finally, the paper summarizes the rehabilitation process for patients with ACJ dislocation, including necessary short-term physical therapy and long-term treatment strategies. Despite the fact that acromioclavicular joint dislocations are currently well researched as well as very well studied, and a variety of treatments have been proposed and practiced, the challenge remains to maximize functional recovery and minimize the risk of recurrence. By exploring the anatomical basis of ACJ dislocations, summarizing the mechanisms, evaluating the imaging, summarizing the treatment protocols, and rehabilitating the process, we will be able to provide an optimal treatment plan for this type of patient in the future, which will significantly improve the patient's quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.