ArticleGlobalization and health2026
Young adults in times of overlapping social crises: dynamic profiles of mental health and crisis-related concerns using latent transition analysis.
Article in Globalization and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, young adults have navigated multiple, simultaneous crises - COVID-19, war in Ukraine, economic turbulence, climate change, and rapid AI growth - which pose complex mental-health risks. Drawing on multisystemic resilience models and the dual-factor model of mental health, we examine how individual (emotion-regulation difficulties), relational (attachment, social support), and contextual resources (social engagement, place attachment, socioeconomic status) relate to distinct emotional-response profiles and their change across three waves (July 2023, February 2024, September 2024) in a representative Polish sample (N = 1,110; 51.1% women, 48.5% men, 0.5% another/undisclosed; ages 18–30; M = 24.32, SD = 3.74). Anxiety, depression, life satisfaction, and crisis-related concerns were analysed with LPA and LTA, alongside predictors: emotion-regulation difficulties, attachment anxiety/avoidance, social support, social engagement, place attachment, and socioeconomic indicators. A five-profile solution fit best at each wave, and Wave 1 profile proportions were as follows: (1) Severely Distressed & Highly Concerned (14.5%), (2) Highly Distressed & Moderately Concerned (26.8%), (3) Highly Worried but Satisfied (24.9%), (4) Content & Mildly Concerned (30.2%), and (5) Content & Carefree (3.6%) with most participants remaining in the same profile across waves. Emotion regulation difficulties and attachment anxiety increased the likelihood of membership in highly distressed profiles. In contrast, lower attachment avoidance, higher social support, and place identity facilitated adaptive transitions toward profiles characterized by lower distress or recovery. Active place attachment and social engagement were distinctly associated with membership in the subgroup marked by high crisis-related concerns but preserved well-being. These person-centered findings reveal diverse, dynamic mental-health trajectories in times of polycrisis. Interventions that foster emotion regulation skills, secure attachment, supportive social networks, and community engagement may help young people maintain or regain well-being amid ongoing societal challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.