ArticleBMC biology2026
Male sterility in Drosophila hybrids revealed by a multi-generational transcriptomic analysis of genes and transposable elements in testes.
Article in BMC biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHybridization can trigger phenotypic and transcriptomic changes, leading to reproductive isolation and genome evolution. Drosophila is a key model for understanding the genetic basis of speciation, yet the complete process leading to hybrid sterility remains unknown. We investigated the regulation of genes and transposable elements (TEs) from the onset of sterility to fertility recovery through backcrossing.
resultsWe studied the testicular transcriptomes of Drosophila buzzatii, D. koepferae, sterile F1 hybrids, from several unidirectional crosses, and subsequent backcross generations. F1 hybrids presented testicular atrophy, absence of sperm, increased body size, and gene misregulation. Successive backcrosses with D. buzzatii restored gene expression and fertility in the third generation, but a set of 13 genes remained deregulated, potentially contributing to persistent gene flow barriers. TE expression exhibited a tendency towards underexpression, particularly for D. buzzatii-derived elements, with partial derepression in subsequent backcrosses. Importantly, 32% of differentially expressed genes (DEG) between parental species harbored lineage-specific TE insertions in flanking or intragenic regions, suggesting a putative role of these elements in shaping regulatory differences between these species. Regulatory divergence analyses identified DEG with cis and trans regulatory changes as prevalent in parental species, whereas compensatory regulation was enriched in misexpressed genes in hybrids.
conclusionsHybrid incompatibilities may result from extensive deregulation of genes related to development, metabolism, and reproduction, possibly combined with the activity of specific TE copies. These findings demonstrate the complexity of regulatory incompatibilities in hybrids and the contribution of persistent deregulated genes and TE dynamics to postzygotic isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.