Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41761225›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Intra-action review of West African health Organization's response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Economic Community of West African states (ECOWAS) region, 2020 - 2022.

Virgil Kuassi Lokossou, Aishat Bukola Usman, Clementine Sorho, Tome Ca, William Bosu, Sybil Ossei-Agyeman-Yeboah, Yves Mongbo, Olivier Manigart, Felix Agbla, Issiaka Sombie and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Virgil Kuassi LokossouWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Aishat Bukola UsmanWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. ausman@prj.wahooas.org.
Clementine SorhoWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Tome CaWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
William BosuWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Sybil Ossei-Agyeman-YeboahWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Yves MongboWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Olivier ManigartWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Felix AgblaWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Issiaka SombieWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Melchior Athanase AïssiWest African Health Organization, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe West African Health Organization (WAHO) coordinated the regional response to COVID-19 across the 15 ECOWAS Member States. The scale and duration of the pandemic exposed structural weaknesses requiring systematic evaluation. This intra-action review (IAR) assessed WAHO’s performance, operational gaps, and lessons learned from 2020 to 2022 to strengthen future regional preparedness and response.

methodsA convergent mixed-methods design was used, integrating a targeted desk review, an online survey of WAHO staff, Member State focal points, and liaison officers, 18 key informant interviews, and data from structured IAR meetings conducted between 2021 and 2022. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative interviews, document, and IAR outputs underwent thematic analysis. Integration was achieved through triangulation, convergence coding, and joint displays across nine core response domains, including coordination, surveillance, laboratory systems, logistics, digital information systems, risk communication, workforce capacity, and cross-border collaboration.

resultsSixty-six respondents completed the survey (63.5% response rate), and 18 interviews were conducted. The highest-rated domains were coordination, laboratory, vaccination readiness, and cross-border collaboration, while digital information systems scored lowest. Qualitative data highlighted WAHO’s strong political convening role, rapid dissemination of harmonized guidance, effective pooled procurement of diagnostics and PPE, and expansion of laboratory and workforce capacities. However, persistent challenges emerged: fragmented digital reporting systems, variable connectivity, customs-related logistical delays, and uneven access to training across countries. Divergence was observed between quantitative and qualitative data for risk communication—survey scores were moderate, but interviews revealed widespread infodemic pressure. Integrated findings demonstratestrong convergence between quantitative and qualitative data for coordination, laboratory systems, and cross-border collaboration, while systemic gaps particularly in digital systems and logistics, limited operational efficiency.

conclusionWAHO played a critical role in coordinating the ECOWAS COVID-19 response, particularly in strengthening regional coordination, laboratory capacity,and cross-border public health functions. Persistent weaknesses in digital surveillance systems, last-mile logistics, and equitable access to training highlight areas requiring sustained investment. Overall,the findings align with broader regional and global evaluations, underscoring the essential role of strong regional institutions in advancing effective and resilient health security in West Africa. Institutionalizing routine IAR/AAR processes, clarifying mandates, and strengthening digital infrastructure and workforce systems are key priorities for enhancing preparedness for future public health emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Africa, WesternHumansPandemic PreparednessPandemicsPublic Health InfrastructureSARS-CoV-2COVID-19ECOWASHealth securityIntra-action reviewPreparednessRegional response

Identifiers

PMID41761225
PMCPMC13049954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.