ArticleBMC nursing2026
From curiosity to continuance: explaining nursing students' continuance learning intention in virtual simulation using an integrated ECM-TAM.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVirtual simulation is integral to modern nursing education, yet the “acceptance-discontinuance anomaly”—where students cease usage after initial adoption, resulting in fragmented skill acquisition—remains a challenge. Understanding the determinants of Continuance Learning Intention (CLI) is crucial for sustainable competency development. This study aims to investigate the factors influencing nursing students’ CLI toward virtual simulation by integrating the Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and the construct of Clinical Curiosity.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at a medical university in Shanghai, Eastern China. A total of 281 nursing students with experience in virtual simulation were recruited to complete an online survey. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the hypothesized relationships among confirmation, perceived clinical usefulness, satisfaction, attitude, clinical curiosity, and CLI.
resultsThe integrated model explained 43.8% of the variance in CLI. The model demonstrated good fit with a Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) of 0.053. Confirmation significantly predicted Perceived Clinical Usefulness (PCU) and Satisfaction (p < 0.001). Satisfaction (β = 0.341, p < 0.001) and Attitude (β = 0.402, p < 0.001) were direct predictors of CLI. Notably, Clinical Curiosity did not directly predict intention (β = 0.045, p = 0.323). Instead, mediation analysis revealed that Attitude fully mediated the relationship between Clinical Curiosity and CLI (β = 0.084, p < 0.001).
conclusionsClinical relevance and user satisfaction are foundational for retention. Uniquely, intrinsic clinical curiosity alone does not guarantee continued learning in this high-stakes educational context; it must be catalyzed into a positive evaluative attitude to drive sustainable usage. Instructional designs should prioritize bridging curiosity-triggering content with attitude-reinforcing debriefings to foster long-term engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.