SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2026
Prevalence and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac arrest in the intensive care unit (ICU-CA) is distinct from other in-hospital cardiac arrests, involving critically ill patients in monitored settings. Its prevalence and outcomes remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to fill this evidence gap and identify areas for future research to improve outcomes in this patient population.
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases from inception until 26 November 2025 for studies reporting on ICU-CA in adults. We performed random effects meta-analyses with the generalised linear mixed model. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist to assess risk of bias and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. The primary outcome was the prevalence of patients with ICU-CA; secondary outcomes included ICU and in-hospital mortality. We performed subgroup analyses based on geographical region (continent), study source (registry vs. non-registry), and COVID-19 status (infected vs. non-infected).
resultsWe included 35 observational studies including 36 cohorts in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of ICU-CA was 3.23% (95% CI: 2.08–4.98, moderate certainty). The proportion of ICU-CA was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with COVID-19 (10.6%, 95%-CI: 5.4–19.7) compared with non-COVID-19 cohorts (2.3%, 95%-CI: 1.5–3.5). Pooled ICU mortality was 74.0% (95%-CI: 63.7–82.1, moderate certainty) and in-hospital mortality was 82.0% (95%-CI: 75.9–86.9, high certainty). Meta-regression found that proportion of shockable rhythm was inversely associated with ICU mortality, but not in-hospital mortality.
conclusionCardiac arrest in the ICU was associated with poor survival, with a higher prevalence in patients with COVID-19. Future studies should focus on peri-arrest characteristics to guide prognostication and management of individuals who experience ICU-CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.