ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Hand movements prediction via fNIRS and AI algorithms.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHand movement prediction enables the creation of personalized rehabilitation programs that align with individual neural patterns. It is particularly beneficial for patients recovering from strokes or other motor impairments, allowing therapists to adjust treatments in real time based on brain activity feedback, leading to more effective patient care. To this end, this study aims at predicting hand movements using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms.
methodsWe employed fNIRS and collect cortical activity associated with hand movements and utilized machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the hand movement. For the prediction task, various Machine Learning algorithms, including Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machines with polynomial (SVM Poly) and radial basis function (SVM RBF) kernels, Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Neural Networks (NN), Gradient Boosting (GB), and AdaBoost, were used.
resultsThe performance of the RF algorithm was notably superior, demonstrating high accuracy in predicting hand movements. In contrast, LR, SVM (Poly), SVM (RBF), GNB, and NN algorithms exhibited poor performance, while kNN, DT, GB, and AdaBoost algorithms showed moderate effectiveness. In addition, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves indicated that the RF algorithm had significantly larger areas under the curve (AUC) compared to other algorithms.
conclusionThe integration of fNIRS with AI improves hand movement prediction, suggesting advancements in rehabilitation and personalized medicine. This study emphasizes the potential of these algorithms. More research is required to expand their applications across various clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.