ArticleBMC public health2026
Modeling the dynamics of seasonal influenza in response to meteorological conditions and antigenic variation: a simulation study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fusing meteorological factors and baidu search index with an adapted deformtime model to predict influenza-like illness in Beijing.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeasonal influenza annually creates a serious burden for people worldwide. The influenza surveillance system in China primarily indicates the intensity of the influenza epidemic trend, but it cannot provide accurate forecasts and early warnings. Meteorological conditions and antigenic variation rarely participated in optimizing the influenza model, which not only limits the simulation and prediction of influenza trends but also the development of reasonable preventive measures.
methodsThe weekly influenza-like illness percentage (ILI%) data from Baoji (BJ) and Qinhuangdao (QHD) were collected from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Data on meteorological factors were used from the China Meteorological Administration spanning from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019. The SIRS model, driven by temperature and relative humidity data, was employed to simulate and predict seasonal influenza over multiple years in two cities of Northern China: Baoji (Shaanxi Province) and Qinhuangdao (Hebei Province).
resultsOur model simulations indicated that both raw and smoothed meteorological data could be used to capture multi-year seasonal influenza trends. When antigenic variation was not incorporated, simulations based on raw data and those based on smoothed data yielded consistent performance within each city: in Baoji (RMSE_S = 1.59, [Formula: see text]=0.45) and Qinhuangdao (RMSE_S = 0.5, [Formula: see text]=0.56). Critically, incorporating antigenic variation was associated with a marked improvement in model performance. This improvement was evidenced by two key findings: in Baoji, this inclusion enabled a better representation of the 2016 peak and fitted the model more closely to the observed incidence in the following two seasons; in Qinhuangdao, it led to a more accurate prediction of the 2018 outbreak peak (raw data: RMSE_P: 0.55 < 0.67, [Formula: see text]: 0.48 > 0.24; smoothed data: RMSE_P: 0.47 < 0.67, [Formula: see text]: 0.62 > 0.24).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that integrating antigenic variation data with meteorological drivers is critical for accurate influenza forecasting in temperate China. These findings provide a mechanistic basis for proactive surveillance. By combining real-time meteorological and genomic data, such systems would enhance early warning and help optimize the timing of interventions like targeted vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.