ArticleBMC oral health2026
Assessing the willingness of Nigerian dentists to adopt salivary diagnostic kits: a pilot cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSaliva has emerged as a valuable diagnostic fluid because of its non-invasive collection, cost-effectiveness, and the presence of multiple biomarkers. Despite its clinical potential, the use of saliva-based diagnostics in low- and middle-income countries, including Nigeria, remains limited.
objectiveThis pilot study assessed Nigerian dentists’ awareness and willingness to adopt ancillary salivary diagnostic kits in dental practice.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted among 119 licensed dentists in Nigeria, using an online questionnaire. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, encountered oral and medical conditions, diagnostic practices, and willingness to use saliva diagnostics were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed using SPSS (version 26), with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsThe majority of respondents were aged 20–29 years (52.1%) and had graduated within the past five years (66.4%). While 71.4% reported an awareness of saliva diagnostics, only 23.5% had previously used saliva testing. Dental caries (92.4%), plaque/calculus (73.1%), and tooth wear lesions (42.9%) were the most frequently reported oral conditions, whereas hypertension (93.3%) and diabetes (73.1%) were the most common medical conditions observed among patients. Overall, 64.7% of the respondents expressed a high willingness to adopt saliva-based diagnostics. Willingness was significantly associated with the number of years since graduation (p = 0.046) and residency training status (p = 0.033), but not with age, gender, or ethnicity.
conclusionThis pilot study demonstrated a high level of awareness but low utilization of saliva diagnostics, with younger and trainee dentists showing a potentially greater willingness to adopt these tools. Targeted educational initiatives, integration into dental curricula, and supportive policies are required to promote the clinical uptake of saliva-based diagnostics in Nigeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.