ArticleBMC public health2026
Association between frailty status and depression among older adults: panel data analysis of three longitudinal cohort studies.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDeclining physical function and increasing frailty are common in older adults, and physical frailty is associated with psychological disorders. This study examined the association between the Frailty Index (FI) and depression among older adults from three countries.
methodsThis study utilized data from participants aged 50 and older in three studies: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS), and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), comprising 52,211 individuals with 139,513 observations. Frailty was assessed using a 27-item FI, encompassing diseases (excluding heart disease and stroke), symptoms, disabilities, physical function, and cognition, scored from 0 to 1. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) with binary logistic regression were used to examine the FI-depression association, adjusting for potential confounders identified via causal directed acyclic graphs. Additionally, curve fitting was applied to explore non-linear relationships, while Poisson binomial regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings.
resultsIn the fully adjusted model (Model 3), a higher FI (per 0.1-unit increase) was positively associated with greater odds of depression (CHARLS: β = 1.7, 95% CI 1.7–1.8; HRS: β = 2.0, 95% CI 1.9–2.1; ELSA: β = 1.6, 95% CI 1.6–1.6). Compared to the robust group (FI ≤ 0.10), the frail group (FI ≥ 0.25) had significantly higher odds of depression (CHARLS: OR = 4.9, 95% CI 4.5–5.3; HRS: OR = 4.3, 95% CI 3.8–4.9; ELSA: OR = 4.4, 95% CI 4.0–4.8). When FI was categorized into tertiles, the highest tertile (T3) was associated with increased odds of depression compared to the lowest tertile (CHARLS: OR = 3.4, 95% CI 3.2–3.7; HRS: OR = 2.7, 95% CI 2.5–3.0; ELSA: OR = 3.3, 95% CI 3.0–3.6).
conclusionA positive association was observed between the Frailty Index and depression among older adults in CHARLS, HRS, and ELSA. these findings suggest that maintaining physical robustness is associated with a lower burden of depressionin older populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.