ArticleBMC medical education2026
Sexual harassment at German medical schools - a national cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction: Sexual harassment at German medical schools - a national cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- #MEDToo - sexual harassment in medical education: perceptions and coping strategies of medical students in Germany, a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSexual harassment in medical education is a relevant and well-documented issue that adversely affects students’ mental health, academic engagement and professional development. While several single-faculty studies in Germany have already demonstrated its prevalence, nationally comparable data on the circumstances and consequences of sexual harassment have been lacking. This study provides nationwide data on the extent of sexual harassment, its contextual factors, and consequences for medical students.
methodA cross-sectional online survey was distributed via the German Medical Students’ Association (bvmd) to medical students across Germany. The questionnaire provided a definition of sexual harassment based on the German General Act on Equal Treatment, illustrated with examples and covered eight thematic areas, addressing both personal experiences and witnessed incidents. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression models.
resultsA total of 5,681 students from 44 German Medical Schools participated. 42,1% reported experiencing sexual harassment, with an increase from preclinical years (29.8%) to clinical years (46.8%) and the practical year (66%). Most affected students reported experiencing repeated harassment. Among final-year students, 73.5% of women and 29.3% of men reported experiencing sexual harassment at some point during their studies. The most common perpetrators were patients (93.8%), fellow students (69.2%) and senior physicians (64.1%). Surgical disciplines exhibited the highest rates of harassment (64.9%), and nearly half (46.0%) of affected students reported that harassment influenced their specialty choice. Harassment was primarily reported in the context of nursing internships, elective placements, the practical year, and extracurricular events. Female students indicated that the perpetrators were almost exclusively male, while male students reported a more heterogeneous distribution. Female students also reported significantly greater distress, largely corresponding to their higher frequency of harassment experiences.
conclusionSexual harassment affects a substantial proportion of medical students in Germany and has far-reaching consequences. These findings highlight the need to strengthen prevention measures and targeted interventions to create a safe and respectful learning environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.