ArticleBMC public health2026
Living arrangements, household registration status and depression among older adults in mainland China.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression constitutes a substantial psychological issue among older adults in China. Traditional Chinese culture emphasizes family care for older adults; however, modernization has increased institutional care. This study aimed to examine the association between living arrangements and depression among older adults in China while considering the moderating effect of household registration status (hukou) due to rural–urban disparities in social resources.
methodsWe utilized Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey 2018 data involving 10,089 older adults. Depression was assessed utilizing the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Living arrangements included living alone or with a spouse, with children, and in institutions. The household registration status was urban or rural. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the direct and moderating effects.
resultsOlder adults living with children were less depressed than those living alone or with a spouse. Older adults staying in institutions had fewer depressive symptoms. Rural older adults experienced higher levels of depression than their urban counterparts. The household registration status played a role in the relationship between living in institutions versus living alone or with a spouse and depression, where urban areas showed a significant positive effect.
conclusionThe results are consistent with the convoy model of social relations, social integration theory, and the stress-buffering hypothesis, which explain how social resources and living arrangements can lessen depression among the older adults. Living in urban areas provides more opportunities for social networks and resources, contributing to better mental health. The present work serves to inform urban and rural policies with regard to increasing social support and decreasing depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.