Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2026
The impact of a 24-hour call shift on cognitive function and simulated resuscitation performance in anaesthesia providers: a pilot study.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtended work hours contribute to fatigue among healthcare professionals, but their specific impact on anaesthesia providers remains poorly defined. This exploratory pilot study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of a multidimensional assessment battery to quantify the impact of a 24-hour in-hospital call shift. The primary objective was to identify changes in complex clinical synthesis (represented by multitasking cost and non-technical decision-making). Secondary objectives included assessing changes in subjective state, standardised cognitive domains, and technical resuscitation performance.
methodsWe conducted a prospective, observational, single-centre pilot study at a university hospital in Brussels, Belgium (January–March 2020). Sixteen anaesthesia providers (five junior residents, eight senior residents, three attending physicians) were assessed before and after a 24-hour in-hospital on-call shift. Outcomes included a battery of eight cognitive tests and a simulated Advanced Life Support scenario, evaluating both technical and non-technical skills. Subjective fatigue and sleepiness were measured with the Samn-Perelli Scale and the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. Statistical analysis involved paired comparisons with Bonferroni corrections applied within outcome families.
resultsParticipants reported significant increases in sleepiness (P = 0.006) and fatigue (P = 0.002) following the shift. Objective performance on standardised computerised tests was largely preserved. Sustained attention improved (P = 0.002), but multitasking efficiency showed only a non-significant trend toward improvement (P = 0.014). In contrast, within the simulated resuscitation, clinical decision-making declined significantly (P = 0.014). Technical skills and other cognitive domains, including memory and planning, did not change significantly after adjustment for multiple comparisons.
conclusionsThis pilot study suggests a dissociation between preserved performance on structured cognitive tasks and impaired clinical decision-making following a 24-hour shift. These results suggest that extended work hours may selectively compromise the capacity to manage complex, unstructured clinical situations even when standardised testing remains intact. Our findings identify clinical decision-making as a high-sensitivity marker for future large-scale research into fatigue-mitigation strategies.
trial registrationApproved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Brussels (UZ Brussel, ref: 2019 − 349, Chairperson prof. M. Deneyer, 23rd October 2019). Clinical trial number: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.