Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2026
Factors influencing the prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: an analysis of the Utstein Registry in Aichi, Japan.
Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major global public health concern, with survival rates remaining low despite decades of efforts to enhance emergency response systems. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic significantly impacted emergency medical services (EMS), causing longer response intervals, changes in airway management practices, and reduced bystander intervention, which may have altered the prognostic factors associated with OHCA outcomes. This study aimed to identify factors associated with favorable neurological outcomes among patients with OHCA and investigate how these factors changed across three periods: pre-COVID-19 (2017–2019), early COVID-19 (2020–2021), and late COVID-19 (2022–2023).
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study using Utstein-style Registry data from Aichi Prefecture, Japan (2017–2023). Patient demographics, bystander interventions, EMS activities, and outcomes were compared across periods. Neurological outcomes were assessed using the Cerebral Performance Category, with scores of 1–2 considered favorable (mortality recorded as Cerebral Performance Category 5). To identify factors independently associated with favorable outcomes, logistic regression analyses were separately performed for each period.
resultsOf 51,890 patients, the proportion of favorable neurological outcomes declined from 4.6% (pre-COVID-19) to 3.4% (early) and 3.1% (late). In the regression model excluding return of spontaneous circulation, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for initial ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia decreased from 4.340 (pre) to 3.516 (early), whereas the aOR for witnessed arrest increased from 5.866 (pre) to 8.097 (early). During the early period, the association of bystander defibrillation peaked, whereas the negative association of advanced airway management progressively strengthened, with aORs decreasing from 0.268 (pre) to 0.182 (late).
conclusionsPrognostic factors for favorable neurological outcomes changed across the three COVID-19 periods, indicating that the pandemic altered both the OHCA case mix and the relative importance of key resuscitation elements. Continuous adaptation of EMS systems is crucial for sustaining outcomes under shifting clinical and operational conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.