ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Feasibility and safety of right heart catheterization via median cubital vein in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the feasibility and safety of right heart catheterization (RHC) via the cubital vein.
methodsThis retrospective-prospective cohort study included 93 patients (January 2020–June 2023) in the retrospective phase, with 48 undergoing cubital vein RHC (R-CV) and 45 femoral vein RHC (R-FV). A prospective phase (July 2023–October 2024) enrolled 60 patients, each undergoing both approaches. Subgroup analysis divided patients by right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (≥ 3.80 cm vs. <3.80 cm).
resultsR-CV showed fewer complications (8.89% vs. 0%, p = 0.028) and shorter fluoroscopy time (178.27 ± 43.27 s vs. 210.76 ± 54.80 s, p = 0.002) than R-FV. In patients with right ventricular dilation (≥ 3.80 cm), cubital vein RHC reduced fluoroscopy time compared to femoral vein RHC (p < 0.001).
conclusionCubital vein RHC is safe, efficient, and especially advantageous for patients with enlarged right ventricles, warranting wider adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.